<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cloud Computing, Utility Computing, Bah Humbug!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toutvirtual.com/blogs/index.php/2008/12/17/cloud-computing-utility-computing-bah-humbug/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toutvirtual.com/blogs/2008/12/17/cloud-computing-utility-computing-bah-humbug/</link>
	<description>Best Practices Guide to Virtualization - From Getting Started with Virtualization to Advanced Strategic Virtualization Concepts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:51:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Schorschi</title>
		<link>http://toutvirtual.com/blogs/2008/12/17/cloud-computing-utility-computing-bah-humbug/comment-page-1/#comment-31476</link>
		<dc:creator>Schorschi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 05:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toutvirtual.com/blogs/2008/12/17/cloud-computing-utility-computing-bah-humbug/#comment-31476</guid>
		<description>Yes, a number of firms I know of, to various degrees are moving to cloud concepts.  And from what I see, the struggle with the technology is consistent.  However, if it was easy it would already be wide spread and universal across the industry leaders.  The weak point is not virtualization per se, but workload management, and agnostic uniform control.  For example, if you have Citrix, KVM, and VMware running, you have application virtualization, containers (OS based) and full virtualization running, but can not control them from one concept or view?  And that is exactly what an enterprise customer needs and wants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, a number of firms I know of, to various degrees are moving to cloud concepts.  And from what I see, the struggle with the technology is consistent.  However, if it was easy it would already be wide spread and universal across the industry leaders.  The weak point is not virtualization per se, but workload management, and agnostic uniform control.  For example, if you have Citrix, KVM, and VMware running, you have application virtualization, containers (OS based) and full virtualization running, but can not control them from one concept or view?  And that is exactly what an enterprise customer needs and wants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloud Computing Australia</title>
		<link>http://toutvirtual.com/blogs/2008/12/17/cloud-computing-utility-computing-bah-humbug/comment-page-1/#comment-31377</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloud Computing Australia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toutvirtual.com/blogs/2008/12/17/cloud-computing-utility-computing-bah-humbug/#comment-31377</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the information.  You may be interested to know that Telstra - Australia&#039;s biggest telco has just announced (on 17th August) a $500m investment into cloud computing which is pretty huge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the information.  You may be interested to know that Telstra &#8211; Australia&#8217;s biggest telco has just announced (on 17th August) a $500m investment into cloud computing which is pretty huge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.535 seconds -->
